- #QUAD CORE VS 6 CORE MAC PRO PRO#
- #QUAD CORE VS 6 CORE MAC PRO PROFESSIONAL#
- #QUAD CORE VS 6 CORE MAC PRO WINDOWS#
#QUAD CORE VS 6 CORE MAC PRO PRO#
IDGĪnd, of course, were again left wondering just what the hell is going on with the Mac Pro as the tiny Dell XPS 13 2-in-1 comes in about 36 percent faster than the Mac in single-threaded performance. Apple actually sells a 12-core version of the Mac Pro still so this result would likely be somewhat applicable to putting the top-end Mac Pro against the XPS 13 2-in-1. We also run Cinebench R20 in its single-threaded mode to try to gauge the speed of each core. The Mac Pro “wins” but let’s really call this a tie. That’s insane when you again think about how Apple is still selling this “professional-class” workstation, and it’s basically dead even with a 2.8 lbs. Although the Mac Pro is the technical winner here, this is basically a tie. 4-core: no contest right? Yeah think again. Geekbench also tests a single-core mode, which is actually probably closer to most people will see in their day-to-day applications. The thing is, it actually gets uglier-and not for the tiny little laptop either. It’s not a lot, but the fact that the Apple has two more cores should be to its advantage in this test. A quad-core Dell XPS 13 2-in-1 ultrabook is faster than a desktop Mac Pro in Geekbench 5.0. It should and does scale with core count, so no contest right? The latest version of Primate Lab’s Geekbench 5 is a little more intense than previous versions. The Xeon, mind you, has far less thermal restrictions with its 130-watt TDP, and both CPUs actually have the same boost clocks of 3.9GHz. The latest version is more intensive than previous ones and should scale with cores and threads, so a 15-watt TDP quad-core laptop CPU should theoretically have no chance against a 6-core Xeon E5-1650 V2. The first test is Primate Lab’s recently unveiled Geekbench 5.
#QUAD CORE VS 6 CORE MAC PRO WINDOWS#
So how does Apple’s long-abandoned (but still sold) flagship Mac Pro stack up against a thin-and-light modern Windows laptop? Let’s find out-for science! For our tests, we used popular available tests for both Windows and MacOS. And yes, the 2-in-1 is a 360-degree design so it can be used as a tablet. The 1920×1200 resolution touchscreen also supports pen input. The new XPS 13 2-in-1 7390 features a quad-core Intel 10th-gen Core i7-1065G7 with 16GB of LPDDR4X and a 512GB SSD. We wanted to see just how far Intel’s CPUs have progressed, so we ran a few modern benchmarks against both the Mac Pro and a Dell XPS 13 2-in-1 7390 Remove non-product linkthat we’re still reviewing.
#QUAD CORE VS 6 CORE MAC PRO PROFESSIONAL#
Gordon Mah UngĬan an ultrabook beat a professional workstation? Yup. All told, our clone probably costs $5,000. We think you’ll agree too since our homebrew, uhh, “Mack” Pro features a 32-core Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX CPU, a GeForce RTX 2080 Ti graphics card, a 2TB Corsair MP600 SSD, and 64GB of RAM in a prototype Dune Pro case. With its 16GB of RAM and 256GB SSD for $3,000, that’s just not fair at all. Here's another side-by-side test from a different YouTube user.Anyway, we only had benchmark numbers for what was once Apple’s mid-range Mac Pro with a 6-core Xeon E5-1650V2 with dual Fire Pro D500 GPUs. Such as this one, depicting the system's Core-i9 CPU throttling all the way down to 800MHz in a Prime95 test. However, more reports from various 2018 MBPr users are surfacing that back up Dave Lee's claims. Maybe the CPU is defective or this is simply a malfunctioning unit that isn't cooling as it's designed to. You're arguing that this is just an isolated incident. While Premiere Pro isn't necessarily optimized for MacOS, that is a considerable difference. Then again, a similar Windows system - Gigabyte's Aero 15x laptop - renders the file in just over 7 minutes. Both graphics cards and CPUs will scale back performance after heating a certain temperature to reduce heat and prevent damage. The MacBook Pro has a very thin unibody chassis, and it likely can't offer adequate cooling and heat dissipation to support a 6-core beast like Intel's 8950HK. To be clear this is not a knock against Intel but rather against Apple's thermal solution.
0 kommentar(er)
